The Humanity Preservation Project

Research & Humanitarian Simulations

Evidence standard. Simulations are models built on assumptions. Their outputs are hypotheses, not findings. Nothing on this page presents a speculative outcome as established fact.

Purpose

AI-assisted simulations could help compare responses to a crisis — humanitarian intervention, voluntary safe havens, community-led reform, and other nonmilitary alternatives such as mediation, aid corridors, and documentation for lawful institutions — before anyone acts. In line with Principle 8, coercive or military options are treated as last resorts and evaluated against the alternatives, not the reverse.

Method

  1. State the scenario and the people affected.
  2. List every input and label it Verified, Contested, or Hypothetical.
  3. Model several options side by side, including “no extraordinary intervention.”
  4. Report ranges and uncertainty, never single confident predictions.
  5. Test against HPP-001 §9 failure modes (mission creep, false accusations, biased evidence, paternalism).
  6. Have human reviewers, including representatives of affected communities, challenge the results.

Evidence labels

LabelMeaning
VerifiedSupported by multiple independent, cited sources
ContestedSources disagree or reliability is uncertain
HypotheticalAn assumption made for modelling; not evidence
Simulated outputA model result; never treated as fact

Scenario template

scenario_id:        SIM-0000
title:
status:             draft | under review | archived
evidence_status:    hypothetical | contested | verified (per input)
affected_groups:
assumptions:        - [label: hypothetical] ...
verified_inputs:    - [source citation] ...
options_compared:
  - no extraordinary intervention
  - humanitarian aid / corridors
  - voluntary safe haven
  - community-led reform / mediation
  - other nonmilitary alternative
metrics:            lives protected, freedoms preserved, reversibility, collateral harm
uncertainty:        ranges, sensitivity analysis
failure_mode_tests: HPP-001 §9
human_review:       reviewers, dissent recorded
conclusion_type:    hypothesis only — not a factual finding

Simulations use hypothetical or public aggregate data only. This project does not collect reports about real individuals or allegations.